£100m funds to help business

Applications open for lifeline support schemes.

A £100 million package of additional grant support for small and medium sized businesses (SMEs) and newly self-employed people opens for applications later today.

The three separate funds will be administered by local authorities and Scotland’s enterprise agencies and will begin to pay out grants in early May.

They include a £34 million hardship fund for the newly self-employed, a £20 million fund for small and micro enterprises in the creative, tourism and hospitality sectors and £45 million for viable SMEs crucial to the Scottish economy which are vulnerable.

Economy Secretary Fiona Hyslop said: “Our economy has been hit hard by this crisis and previously profitable businesses have seen demand dry up overnight. Our support will help alleviate the hardship those individuals and companies are facing.

“I am particularly pleased that we will be able to help the newly self-employed who do not qualify for the UK’s scheme and are facing financial hardship as a result of coronavirus (COVID-19).

“We also recognise the particular impact of COVID-19 on our creative, tourism and hospitality sectors at what would normally be their busiest period. This fund is intended to relieve the hardship of smaller firms that are ineligible for other forms of support.

“As well as dealing with this immediate crisis, we must look to the future. We must ensure that viable and vital businesses in all sectors with a part to play in strengthening the resilience of Scotland’s economy survive this crisis and thrive in future, which is why £45 million is being allocated to support those firms.

“We continue to engage with businesses on a regular basis to understand their needs and press the UK Government to deliver for them.”

Background:

Applicants can access these funds and more via the www.FindBusinessSupport.gov.scot website. All funds will be open for applications by 1400.

The funds which make up the £100 million support package are as follows:

  • £34 million Newly Self-Employed Hardship Fund, managed by Local Authorities, will be allocated to the newly self-employed who are ineligible for UK support (as they became self-employed since April 2019) but are facing hardship with £2,000 grants
  • £20 million Creative, Tourism & Hospitality Enterprises Hardship Fund, managed by the Enterprise Agencies with support from Creative Scotland and VisitScotland for small and micro creative, tourism and hospitality companies not in receipt of business rates relief with grants of up to £25K.
  • £45 million Pivotal Enterprise Resilience Fund, managed by the Enterprise Agencies providing bespoke grants and wrap around business support to viable but vulnerable SMEs who are vital to the local or national economic foundations of Scotland

The Scottish Government is also providing £1 million to top up Creative Scotland’s Bridging Bursaries in the not-for-profit sector.

STA Council Meeting 28th April

Representatives from mainly the accommodation and travel trade sectors met for the STA Council meeting yesterday.

Agenda
– Introduction and general update from Marc Crothall
– Introductory comments from the Cabinet Secretary
– Update on support for businesses with a RV >£51k
– Round table thoughts on a phased recovery process from Council members
– Closing comments from Cabinet Secretary
– Summary and close by Marc Crothall

We welcomed Fergus Ewing, Cabinet Secretary for Rural Tourism and the Economy who thanked the STA and counterparts for the data and evidence we have supplied to make the case to show that there are a huge number of businesses that don’t have any grants or support which he commented, is unfair. A further meeting with the minister and core working group took place this afternoon.

Mr Ewing has written to Nigel Huddleston MP, the UK Tourism Minister and is continuing to make the case for continued necessary support for businesses who have a rateable value of more than £51k and also in relation the government’s furlough scheme.

The Cabinet Secretary welcomed the news of the Bounce Back Loans for small businesses of up to £50k max, commenting that he is interested in learning further detail of that but acknowledged that this is not the same as grant finance with loans still needing repaid although businesses will not be required to produce forward projections to be approved for the loans. Those that may have been declined when applying for a CIBLS loan should not refrain from reapplying for a bounce back loan.

Mr Ewing has been working internally with the Scottish Government and has suggested that the performance of local authorities should be made public in relation to the processing of grant applications.  The very act of publication of these results should, he said, be incentive for those performing least well to ensure that the money gets out quickly, which the Scottish Government wants.

In terms of recovery, he also acknowledged that the longer term challenge will be in establishing how many tourism businesses will be in a position to re-open and operate in the new landscape.  Some can be operated relatively easily and others not so and he acknowledged that the process of recovery will be complicated for the majority in the sector and will require a great deal of planning.

He told us that Fiona Hyslop, Cabinet Secretary for the Economy, Fair Work and Culture and Mr Ewing want to have a compressive plan for each sector within the tourism industry, with everything thought through carefully and he made the point that many weeks of planning will be required before the lockdown measures are lifted.

The Cabinet Secretary acknowledged that without tourism, there isn’t going to be an economy in many rural parts of Scotland.  He acknowledged the reference to the Nordic market being one that might open up more quickly than others and commented that a lot of work is being done with Malcolm Roughead and his team at VisitScotland in identifying and agreeing best markets to target for recovery.

As regards immediate support for the industry, Mr Ewing is keen to ensure that the focus is on filling the gaps of support  – this he stated is “unfinished business”  and he highlighted the risk of losing the businesses that are necessary for us to have a strong tourism product. He underlined the aim of the Scottish Government which is to help businesses survive and for the effort of financial support to succeed.  He told us that this is where his efforts will be devoted over the next few weeks before we move into the recovery phase.

The full minutes from yesterday’s meeting are here.

ASSC Submission to City of Edinburgh Council Consultation, Choices for City

The ASSC has submitted a response to the City of Edinburgh Council Consultation, Choices for City

Choice 9

We want to consult on designating Edinburgh, or parts of Edinburgh, as a ‘Short Term Let Control Area’ where planning permission will always be required for the change of use of whole properties for short-term lets. Do you agree with this approach?

The Association of Scotland’s Self-Caterers (ASSC) note that the Scottish Government consultation on the regulations pertaining to short-term lets from the Planning (Scotland) Act 2019 has not yet taken place. Section 17 of the Act will enable a planning authority to designate all or part of its area as a short-term let control area but the Scottish Government’s consultation will inform what the regulations will include. Before any real substantive discussion on whether Edinburgh as a whole, or parts within the city can be designated as a short-term let control area, the Scottish Government need to provide a proper legal definition of what constitutes a short-term let.

The Private Housing Tenancies (Scotland) Act 2016 introduced a new type of tenancy called the Private Residential Tenancy (PRT), which took effect from December 2017. Any landlord accepting tenants for over 31 days needs to register as a landlord and sign a tenancy agreement with their tenant. Holiday lets are excluded from the terms of the Private Housing (Tenancies) (Scotland) Act 2016. A tenancy created for the purpose of conferring on the tenant the right to occupy the property for a holiday will not constitute a PRT. We believe therefore that any let which does not exceed 31 consecutive nights be considered a short-term let.

Following this, we believe that it is the role of the Scottish Government to define what a short-term let control area is, and how one can be designated. In line with the ASSC’s belief that short-term let control areas must be evidence-based, a nationally-recognised designation of a geographical area, such as a postcode, would be the most appropriate way of demarcating a short-term let control zone.

Once that has been established, we believe that short-term let control areas must follow the following three principles:

  • Proportionate and non-discriminatory, in line with the EU Services Directive

Under the EU Services Directive, the European Commission reserves the right to take to court any jurisdiction found to be introducing laws which are not proportionate or in the public interest. In January 2019, the Commission sued the city of Brussels for introducing rules which were deemed to be disproportionate. According to the European Commission, an authorisation scheme can only constitute an appropriate policy response in instances of high urban pressure.

This leads us to our next point: short-term let control areas must have a firm basis in evidence. The evidence base can be derived from the short-term lets licensing scheme which is also being taken forward by the Scottish Government. Local authorities like City of Edinburgh will be able to see how many short-term lets there are in certain areas. If this number exceeds a certain percentage of the total housing stock, a short-term let control area can be introduced. We do not believe it is proportionate to designate the whole of Edinburgh as a short-term let control area but the Council should be able to introduce control areas within parts of the city if there is a robust evidence-base to support this.

  • Evidence-based and reviewed on an annual basis

Given the dynamic and ever-changing nature of the housing market in Scotland, it is only right that the evidence basis for short-term let control areas should be reviewed on an annual basis. At the start of each year, local authorities like Edinburgh should review whether areas which are currently designated as short-term let control areas still meet the criteria for designation, as well as whether some areas have begun to meet those criteria, and hand out designations on that basis. Given that operators will have to submit the postcode of their property when applying for a short-term letting licence, the ASSC believe that the postal address system is the simplest way of designating areas to become short-term let control areas.

  • Only apply to whole homes let for more than 140 nights per year, in line with existing tax rules in Scotland

Given that the core aim of short-term let control areas is to protect residential housing stock, its controls should not cover homes which are genuinely being lived in for some portion of the year. As such, those letting spare rooms in their homes, and those who are intending to let for fewer than 140 nights per year, should not have to apply for planning permission to continue letting in a short-term let control areas.

Self-Catering accommodation is defined as: “Any lands and heritages which are not the sole or main residence of any person; and b) which either i) are made available by a relevant person for letting, on a commercial basis and with a view to the realisation of profit, as self-catering accommodation for short periods amounting in the aggregate to 140 days or more in the financial year; or ii) if they have not been made so available for letting in that year, are intended by a relevant person to be made so available for letting in that year and the interest of the relevant person in the lands and heritages is such as to enable him to let them for such periods.” (Scottish Assessors Association). This is the definition in terms of Non-Domestic Rates (NDR), at which point a property can no longer be considered to be part of residential housing stock.

If a property is available for let for under 140 days, it means the property is in the Council Tax system and may well be used in part by the primary resident; available for let for over 140 days places the property in NDR. This point is in line with the existing distinction between domestic and commercial use in terms of domestic council tax or commercial use / NDR.

The Private Housing Tenancies (Scotland) Act 2016 introduced a new type of tenancy called the Private Residential Tenancy (PRT), which took effect from December 2017. Holiday lets of under 31 days are excluded from the terms of the Private Housing (Tenancies) (Scotland) Act 2016.

The tax issue is quite different. To qualify as a trading business under the Furnished Holiday Let (FHL) tax rules, a property must be available for let for 210 days and actually let for 105 days.

Dwellings which fall into the two categories articulated above (NDR/FHL) would never be available on the long-term rental market, as they are excluded from PRT legislation and FHL taxation rules.

B We want to create a new policy on the loss of homes to alternative uses. This new policy will be used when planning permission is required for a change of use of residential flats and houses to short-stay commercial visitor accommodation or other uses. Do you agree with that approach? 

Edinburgh City Council state that the policy will set out criteria to help determine when a) material change of use from residential to short-stay commercial accommodation has occurred, and b) when it will be acceptable.

On point (a): the ASSC would like to highlight legal advice on the requirement for planning permission for self-catering properties which is pertinent to this question. This was supplied by the legal firm Brodies LLP in March 2018.

Some of the main points from the legal advice obtained by the ASSC include the statement that:

“…the commercial element (in self-catering use] is broadly similar to a residential property being occupied by a tenant paying rent…The question is therefore whether short stay occupation necessarily has different planning considerations/impacts. Short stay occupation involves people living in the property, just for shorter periods. However, that does not necessarily mean the nature/impacts of the occupation are different.”

The advice goes on to discuss how permanent residents can have different movements depending on a variety of issues, including employment, leisure interests, family circumstances, health. For instance, a family with teenage children might enter and leave the property many times during the day and night. Therefore, the advice maintains that:

“Users of a self-catering property are therefore unlikely to exhibit markedly different characteristics to more permanent residents. Disruptive or anti-social behaviour is just as likely in residential use as self-catering use.”

The advice concludes with the following:

“…reasonable arguments can be made that self-catering use does not involve a material change of use from residential use. That has been the outcome in individual cases decided by appeal reporters/inspectors and upheld by the courts. It is also impliedly supported by the statements in the Scottish Government Circular 4/1998.”

This was sent to the City of Edinburgh Planning Authority back in April 2018.

In relation to point (b), there is a statutory requirement for planning permission to be obtained for “development” (Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, section 28.

  • 2.2 There are 2 aspects to “development”: physical changes (eg. building works) and material changes of use (TCPSA section 26).
  • 2.3 There is no statutory definition of “material change of use”. Whether any change is material, and therefore requires planning permission, is a question of fact and degree for the planning authority to decide.

ASSC’s legal opinion focuses on the use aspect.

As per the answer to choice 9A, we insist on a proper definition of what constitutes a short-stay, and in addition, what constitutes a material change of use. Overall, we feel that the questions on Choice 9 are premature as they come before the Scottish Government’s own consultation on Section 17 of the Planning Act which will inform what the regulations will include. In this, it is obviously imperative that the Scottish Government provide a definition of what constitutes a short-term let. That is necessary before anyone starts to discuss whether to introduce a short-term let control zone within their locality

Take Part in the Consultation Here