Scottish Government Publish STL Licensing Legislation

The Scottish Government have today published their revised legislation to establish short-term let licensing.

consultation report and updated Business and Regulatory Impact Assessment have been released as part of their plans. The government’s press release can be accessed here: https://www.gov.scot/news/licensing-short-term-lets/

In terms of the next steps, the regulations will now have to be approved by MSPs at the Scottish Parliament, including at committee level. The ASSC will continue to engage with MSPs and the government in the weeks ahead and we will endeavour to keep you updated with all relevant developments.

In response to today’s news, Fiona Campbell, the Chief Executive of the Association of Scotland’s Self-Caterers, released the following comment:

“We are very disappointed that the Scottish Government are pressing ahead with these onerous and ill-considered regulations which will damage Scotland’s vital tourism sector at a time when we should be supporting small businesses to recover from Covid-19.”

“The ASSC have always strived to ensure a balanced and proportionate approach and get a regulatory framework in place that works for all. Our proposals for a mandatory registration scheme with health and safety provisions not only have the support of business and tourism stakeholders but have cross-party political support – with the exclusion of the Scottish Greens.”

“The legislation still has to be approved by parliament and we look forward to engaging with MSPs in the weeks ahead to ensure we find a solution that protects jobs and livelihoods in Scotland’s £867m self-catering sector.”

Opinion Piece: Guilty as Charged

“As the newly appointed Chair of the leading trade body representing the Scottish self-catering sector, I am growing increasingly alarmed at the claim being made by some of our national and local politicians that licensing of short-term lets will help to improve access to affordable homes, despite assurances from the Cabinet Secretary for Housing in October, when over provision was removed from the draft SSI, that the rationale behind the proposals is not in fact driven by housing concerns.

“My first question in response to this claim is: how? Given the pronouncements made it is patently obvious that the claimants have not read the detail of the proposed regulations and paid scant attention to the deluge of evidence provided by the ASSC and the wider tourism sector.

“To be blunt, STL licensing is an irrational, illogical, and anti-business policy which has no chance of improving access to affordable homes.

“In a recent article in The Oban Times, the Convenor of the Holyrood Local Government, Housing and Planning Committee states that “the high number of short-term lets in popular tourist spots is leaving people struggling to find somewhere to live.” In that same article a Green Party spokesperson states that “it is time that short term lets are regulated to ensure that long-term housing is available and affordable for residents.” Other politicians representing areas from the Highlands and Edinburgh continue to make similar assertions, despite there being not a shred of evidence demonstrating a direct correlation between the concentrations of self-catering and bed and breakfast provision and the availability of affordable homes. Worse still, promulgation of the link between the two and the claim that licensing will solve the problem gives false hope to those individuals and businesses suffering the very real difficulties caused by the housing crisis. As such the politicians involved are stoking division and having a detrimental impact on community cohesion by persisting with their baseless attack on the livelihoods of thousands of micro-businesses across Scotland.

“The Scottish Government’s stated intention for STL licensing is that it will make sure short-term lets are safe, it will help with issues faced by neighbours from short-term lets, and it will help councils know and understand what is happening in their areas. It therefore seems that the micro and small businesses involved are being asked to pay for a data gathering exercise that may result in their being denied continuation of their livelihoods.

“It seems unlikely that even the advocates of this legislation can believe that it will have any measurable impact on the availability of affordable housing. The reason being that, on their own admission, the Scottish Government has no evidence or data to suggest it will. It seems, therefore, that those who believe regulation can achieve that ambition are highly likely to be sorely disappointed. To state otherwise seems disingenuous at best.

“The housing crisis is precisely that – a crisis. The conclusion that the licensing of legitimate micro self-catering businesses and bed and breakfasts can play even a minor role in solving the problems involved is no more than rhetorical hot air. The spike in house prices over the last two years has had nothing to do with short-term lets. According to local estate agents in the Highlands, the majority of property sales have been to people who want to move from the south to live permanently in local communities. The housing market is badly overheated with no shortage of purchasers who have no intention of letting their homes to tourists. Licensing will not make any difference to this economic reality in a post-Covid world. It’s also relevant that there has been a significant increase in the numbers of bed & breakfasts and guest houses coming on to the market and there is evidence to indicate that the prospect of licensing has prompted their owner’s decision to sell. As currently proposed licensing will have no impact on second homeowners who choose to leave their property empty for 40+ weeks of the year. To suggest otherwise is mere speculation.

“Meanwhile, there are politicians representing Highland and Edinburgh who accuse the ASSC of being protectionist in our call for the replacement of draconian licensing arrangements with a more proportionate registration scheme.

“If it is protectionist to point out that STL licensing will not produce any improvement in the availability of affordable homes, then – guilty as charged.

“If it is protectionist to point out that 55% of our members earnestly believe that the uncertainties inherent in a licensing scheme will force them to close their business, then – guilty as charged.

“If it is protectionist to point out that over 70% of self-catering and bed and breakfast operators and staff are women and licensing will have a disproportionate impact on their costs, workloads and subsequent livelihoods, then – guilty as charged.

“If it is protectionist to point out that at a huge majority of self-catering and bed and breakfast operators are owner occupiers living in their local communities and they will be the most detrimentally affected by Licensing, then – guilty as charged.

“If it is protectionist to point out that Local Authorities will need to recruit dozens of permanent new staff to set up and implement a Licensing scheme, following years of public service austerity and when Covid recovery has barely begun, then – guilty as charged.

“Perhaps local Councillors need to consider how this fact is presented to their electorate prior to the Local Government elections next May. Presenting licensing as a justified response to the housing crisis may be a difficult case to make in these circumstances.”

Adrienne Carmichael, Chair, Association of Scotland’s Self-Caterers

4th November 2021

Adrienne Carmichael Opinion Piece November 2021

ASSC SURVEY INTO THE COST OF COMPLIANCE OF EXISTING LEGISLATION

The ASSC issued a snap survey seeking insights to further inform the Scottish Government and industry on the cost of compliance of existing legislation for small tourism accommodation businesses.

In 22 hours, the survey generated 336 responses from businesses in 26 out of 32 local authorities. 53% were from members of the ASSC and 47% responses were from non-members.

Some of the key findings include:

  • The vast majority of respondents identified that they came from rural areas / islands (81%).
  • 75% or respondents report turnover of under £50k per annum, and 43% under £20k per annum. 
  • The June 2021 BRIA calculated the total compliance costs to be circa £963.00.
  • Real costs identified by operators are three times those identified in the BRIA, illustrating an average cost of £2,969. This will, of course, vary according to urban / rural / remote / island operations.
  • The costs identified in this survey do not include additional costs for ‘Information to be Displayed’, plans to show ‘maximum occupancy’, and other new costs associated with the proposed licensing regime.
  • 76% of respondents’ report increases in operating costs of between 11-75%. The key driver is the pandemic in terms of additional cleaning times, operators leaving fallow days to ensure guests safety, the cost of materials and labour, extra linen costs, plus the need for relaxed cancellation policies.
  • The cost of doing business generally has risen exponentially since the pandemic: “Gas bills have increased by 18%. Electricity bills have increase by 15%. Insurance has increased by 15% and cover has reduced.”

Fiona Campbell, CEO of the Association of Scotland’s Self-Caterers, said:

 “Small tourist accommodation businesses such as self-catering, bed and breakfasts and guest houses have been the backbone of Scotland’s tourist industry for generations.

Professional small businesses – who already comply with numerous regulations – are under threat from an onerous and bureaucratic licensing scheme. This comes at a time when the sector can least afford it as many businesses are still in survival mode due to the pandemic. Instead of burdening operators, policymakers should instead look to protect businesses and livelihoods at this critical phase of Covid-19 recovery with a proportionate and targeted compromise with their proposed legislation.

The ASSC’s exemption proposal for registered accommodation ensures the appropriate regulatory balance – one which supports jobs and livelihoods but also secures the Scottish Government’s policy objectives in a more proportionate and cost-effective manner for those already complying with the proposed mandatory licensing conditions.”

Read More: Cost of Compliance